Hacking The Cell

Computational systems as diverse as vending machines, computers, and cells have something in common: They are all finite-state machines. That is, they may have an initial state, accept inputs, pass to different states according to the inputs received, and even enter states that lead to specific outputs. This kind of activity has been exploited in cells, but not with the degree of control we take for granted with the humble vending machine, which can dispense the right snacks depending on whether we press, say, B4 or C2. The vending machine can even refuse to dispense anything until a certain threshold has been surpassed (the right combination of coins).

In hopes of installing this kind of control into cells, MIT scientists have developed a way to program cells to respond to up to three different inputs. Crucially, the programming is capable of recognizing the order of inputs and responding accordingly. Although three inputs permit just 16 states, the MIT researchers point out that their method is scalable. It could accommodate additional inputs and thereby enable many additional states, enough to permit complex processes such as disease progression and cell differentiation to be tracked. The new synthetic biology approach could even make it possible to intervene in these processes, leading to cancer therapies or guiding the outcome of stem cell development.

MIT scientists designed state machine circuits that rely on enzymes called recombinases. When activated by a specific input in the cell, such as a chemical signal, recombinases either delete or invert a particular stretch of DNA, depending on the orientation of two DNA target sequences known as recognition sites. The stretch of DNA between those sites may contain recognition sites for other recombinases that respond to different inputs. Flipping or deleting those sites alters what will happen to the DNA if a second or third recombinase is later activated. Therefore, a cell’s history can be determined by sequencing its DNA.

The MIT scientists programmed Escherichia coli cells to respond to substances commonly used in lab experiments, including ATc (an analogue of the antibiotic tetracycline), a sugar called arabinose, and a chemical called DAPG. Such programming could be used with other inputs, such as acidity or the presence of specific transcription factors. In addition, cells could be programmed to not only provide a convenient readout of successive states, but also to enable the complex regulation of gene expression.

The researchers tested their approach with three genes that code for different fluorescent proteins—green, red, and blue—constructing a circuit that expressed a different combination of the fluorescent proteins for each identity and order of two inputs. For example, when cells carrying this circuit received input A followed by input B they fluoresced red and green, whereas cells that received B before A fluoresced red and blue.

For example, scientists could use this technique to follow the trajectory of stem cells or other immature cells into differentiated, mature cell types. They could also follow the progression of diseases such as cancer. A recent study has shown that the order in which cancer-causing mutations are acquired can determine the behavior of the disease, including how cancer cells respond to drugs and develop into tumors. Furthermore, engineers could use the state machine platform developed here to program cell functions and differentiation pathways.

For more information on hacking the cell, join me at Cell & Gene Therapy Bioprocessing & Commercialization this October in Boston. And for special savings, be sure to use the VIP code “B16188BLOG” – See you this October.

 

JustinGaines

About the author: Justin Gaines is a Boston-based drug discovery professional and biotech enthusiast. During his tenures he has remained active within the biomedical engineering and regenerative medicine sectors, and has remained an avid proponent of bringing together the Boston life science community. He is currently leading the Bio Pharma Networking Group across the North East – a professional life science and healthcare community spanning 6K members. View his last contribution to KNect365 Bioprocessing here

 

 

Research Reference:

http://science.sciencemag.org/content/353/6297/aad8559

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s